Changes to Engage Grants 2016

Engage Grants are popular with both industry and postsecondary institutions. To ensure the quality and impact of these projects, the following changes will be implemented to preserve the program’s effectiveness while managing its budget:

NOTE: please note that in order for the evaluation and award to occur within the current, 2015-16 NSERC fiscal year an application must be submitted by the Research Grants Office to NSERC no later than Friday, February 19, 2016. This should be considered a key date for researchers aiming for another award before the new limit comes into effect. Applications received after February 19th will count towards the applicant’s one award for the 2016-17 fiscal year.  Please read below  in regards to 2016-2017 fiscal year:

Starting January 15, 2016:

-   Eligible Engage Grants applicants must have received recent peer-reviewed support through NSERC. The rigorous peer review practices provided to NSERC by Canada’s science and engineering braintrust will ensure that high quality university-based Engage projects are selected.

-    Companies participating in Engage must have at least two full-time employees and have been in operation for at least two years when applying. This change will support projects with industrial partners that are positioned to exploit research results beyond the completion of the grant and to sustain the collaboration created through Engage.

 Starting April 1, 2016:

-    Engage Grants applicants at universities will be limited to one new award per fiscal year so applicants can focus on choosing the right company partners. This will not apply to college-based Engage Grants applicants because it’s the institution that applies rather than the researcher.

-    Industrial partners will be limited to two Engage grants per year. However, partners providing cash contributions to ongoing NSERC-funded projects outside of Engage will be allowed up to two additional Engage applications per year. This change will allow companies that demonstrate a commitment to industrial-academic research greater opportunity to make use of Engage to expand their collaborative network.

 These changes are detailed in the Engage Grants description (version updated December 15th). Further additions have been made to the description and instructions to help eligible researchers and companies develop a successful application:

 -   An elaborated description of what constitutes a company-specific problem;

-   An Industrial Participation section that describes eligibility considerations for company partners;

-   Clarification on the right of academic participants to use the intellectual property from the project for future teaching and research;

-   Guidance on what must be addressed in the company letter of support; and

-   An expanded application checklist that summarizes what to provide in the full application, along with a template to make it easier to complete the two-page freeform section of the proposal.


  • Form 187 – Outline of Training Program
    • For applicants who have previously held a CREATE Grant, the proposed initiative must differ significantly from the previous one. An additional page is now allowed to clearly explain this in the Letter of Intent.
    • The HQP table was modified to indicate NSE and Non-NSE trainees.
  • Program Description
    • Details were added to the collaboration with the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) section.
    • Details regarding progress reports and performance evaluations was added.
    • The weighting of the selection criteria was modified.
  • The Frequently Asked Questions have been updated.
  • Form 187 – Outline of Training Program
    • For applicants who have previously held a CREATE Grant, the proposed initiative must differ significantly from the previous one. An additional page is now allowed to clearly explain this in the Letter of Intent.
    • The HQP table was modified to indicate NSE and Non-NSE trainees.
  • Program Description
    • Details were added to the collaboration with the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) section.
    • Details regarding progress reports and performance evaluations was added.
    • The weighting of the selection criteria was modified.
  • The Frequently Asked Questions have been updated.